React's new "hooks" APIs give function components the ability to use local component state, execute side effects, and more. React also lets us write custom hooks, which let us extract reusable hooks to add our own behavior on top of React's built-in hooks.
React Redux includes its own custom hook APIs, which allow your React components to subscribe to the Redux store and dispatch actions.
We recommend using the React-Redux hooks API as the default approach in your React components.
connect API still works and will continue to be supported, but the hooks API is simpler and works better with TypeScript.
These hooks were first added in v7.1.0.
connect(), you should start by wrapping your entire application in a
<Provider> component to make the store available throughout the component tree:
From there, you may import any of the listed React Redux hooks APIs and use them within your function components.
Allows you to extract data from the Redux store state, using a selector function.
The selector function should be pure since it is potentially executed multiple times and at arbitrary points in time.
The selector is approximately equivalent to the
mapStateToProps argument to
connect conceptually. The selector will be called with the entire Redux store state as its only argument. The selector will be run whenever the function component renders (unless its reference hasn't changed since a previous render of the component so that a cached result can be returned by the hook without re-running the selector).
useSelector() will also subscribe to the Redux store, and run your selector whenever an action is dispatched.
However, there are some differences between the selectors passed to
useSelector() and a
- The selector may return any value as a result, not just an object. The return value of the selector will be used as the return value of the
- When an action is dispatched,
useSelector()will do a reference comparison of the previous selector result value and the current result value. If they are different, the component will be forced to re-render. If they are the same, the component will not re-render.
- The selector function does not receive an
ownPropsargument. However, props can be used through closure (see the examples below) or by using a curried selector.
- Extra care must be taken when using memoizing selectors (see examples below for more details).
===reference equality checks by default, not shallow equality (see the following section for more details).
There are potential edge cases with using props in selectors that may cause issues. See the Usage Warnings section of this page for further details.
You may call
useSelector() multiple times within a single function component. Each call to
useSelector() creates an individual subscription to the Redux store. Because of the React update batching behavior used in React Redux v7, a dispatched action that causes multiple
useSelector()s in the same component to return new values should only result in a single re-render.
When the function component renders, the provided selector function will be called and its result will be returned
useSelector() hook. (A cached result may be returned by the hook without re-running the selector if it's the same function reference as on a previous render of the component.)
However, when an action is dispatched to the Redux store,
useSelector() only forces a re-render if the selector result
appears to be different than the last result. As of v7.1.0-alpha.5, the default comparison is a strict
comparison. This is different than
connect(), which uses shallow equality checks on the results of
to determine if re-rendering is needed. This has several implications on how you should use
mapState, all individual fields were returned in a combined object. It didn't matter if the return object was
a new reference or not -
connect() just compared the individual fields. With
useSelector(), returning a new object
every time will always force a re-render by default. If you want to retrieve multiple values from the store, you can:
useSelector()multiple times, with each call returning a single field value
- Use Reselect or a similar library to create a memoized selector that returns multiple values in one object, but only returns a new object when one of the values has changed.
- Use the
shallowEqualfunction from React-Redux as the
The optional comparison function also enables using something like Lodash's
_.isEqual() or Immutable.js's comparison capabilities.
Using props via closure to determine what to extract:
useSelector with an inline selector as shown above, a new instance of the selector is created whenever the component is rendered. This works as long as the selector does not maintain any state. However, memoizing selectors (e.g. created via
reselect) do have internal state, and therefore care must be taken when using them. Below you can find typical usage scenarios for memoizing selectors.
When the selector does only depend on the state, simply ensure that it is declared outside of the component so that the same selector instance is used for each render:
The same is true if the selector depends on the component's props, but will only ever be used in a single instance of a single component:
However, when the selector is used in multiple component instances and depends on the component's props, you need to ensure that each component instance gets its own selector instance (see here for a more thorough explanation of why this is necessary):
This hook returns a reference to the
dispatch function from the Redux store. You may use it to dispatch actions as needed.
When passing a callback using
dispatch to a child component, you may sometimes want to memoize it with
useCallback. If the child component is trying to optimize render behavior using
React.memo() or similar, this avoids unnecessary rendering of child components due to the changed callback reference.
dispatch function reference will be stable as long as the same store instance is being passed to the
Normally, that store instance never changes in an application.
However, the React hooks lint rules do not know that
dispatch should be stable, and will warn that the
should be added to dependency arrays for
useCallback. The simplest solution is to do just that:
This hook returns a reference to the same Redux store that was passed in to the
This hook should probably not be used frequently. Prefer
useSelector() as your primary choice. However, this may be useful for less common scenarios that do require access to the store, such as replacing reducers.
<Provider> component allows you to specify an alternate context via the
context prop. This is useful if you're building a complex reusable component, and you don't want your store to collide with any Redux store your consumers' applications might use.
To access an alternate context via the hooks API, use the hook creator functions:
The React-Redux hooks API has been production-ready since we released it in v7.1.0, and we recommend using the hooks API as the default approach in your components. However, there are a couple of edge cases that can occur, and we're documenting those so that you can be aware of them.
One of the most difficult aspects of React Redux's implementation is ensuring that if your
mapStateToProps function is defined as
(state, ownProps), it will be called with the "latest" props every time. Up through version 4, there were recurring bugs reported involving edge case situations, such as errors thrown from a
mapState function for a list item whose data had just been deleted.
Starting with version 5, React Redux has attempted to guarantee that consistency with
ownProps. In version 7, that is implemented using a custom
Subscription class internally in
connect(), which forms a nested hierarchy. This ensures that connected components lower in the tree will only receive store update notifications once the nearest connected ancestor has been updated. However, this relies on each
connect() instance overriding part of the internal React context, supplying its own unique
Subscription instance to form that nesting, and rendering the
<ReactReduxContext.Provider> with that new context value.
With hooks, there is no way to render a context provider, which means there's also no nested hierarchy of subscriptions. Because of this, the "stale props" and "zombie child" issues may potentially re-occur in an app that relies on using hooks instead of
Specifically, "stale props" means any case where:
- a selector function relies on this component's props to extract data
- a parent component would re-render and pass down new props as a result of an action
- but this component's selector function executes before this component has had a chance to re-render with those new props
Depending on what props were used and what the current store state is, this may result in incorrect data being returned from the selector, or even an error being thrown.
"Zombie child" refers specifically to the case where:
- Multiple nested connected components are mounted in a first pass, causing a child component to subscribe to the store before its parent
- An action is dispatched that deletes data from the store, such as a todo item
- The parent component would stop rendering that child as a result
- However, because the child subscribed first, its subscription runs before the parent stops rendering it. When it reads a value from the store based on props, that data no longer exists, and if the extraction logic is not careful, this may result in an error being thrown.
useSelector() tries to deal with this by catching all errors that are thrown when the selector is executed due to a store update (but not when it is executed during rendering). When an error occurs, the component will be forced to render, at which point the selector is executed again. This works as long as the selector is a pure function and you do not depend on the selector throwing errors.
If you prefer to deal with this issue yourself, here are some possible options for avoiding these problems altogether with
- Don't rely on props in your selector function for extracting data
- In cases where you do rely on props in your selector function and those props may change over time, or the data you're extracting may be based on items that can be deleted, try writing the selector functions defensively. Don't just reach straight into
state.todos[props.id]first, and verify that it exists before trying to read
connectadds the necessary
Subscriptionto the context provider and delays evaluating child subscriptions until the connected component has re-rendered, putting a connected component in the component tree just above the component using
useSelectorwill prevent these issues as long as the connected component gets re-rendered due to the same store update as the hooks component.
For a longer description of these scenarios, see:
As mentioned earlier, by default
useSelector() will do a reference equality comparison of the selected value when running the selector function after an action is dispatched, and will only cause the component to re-render if the selected value changed. However, unlike
useSelector() does not prevent the component from re-rendering due to its parent re-rendering, even if the component's props did not change.
If further performance optimizations are necessary, you may consider wrapping your function component in
We've pared down our hooks API from the original alpha release, focusing on a more minimal set of API primitives. However, you may still wish to use some of the approaches we tried in your own apps. These examples should be ready to copy and paste into your own codebase.
This hook was in our original alpha release, but removed in
v7.1.0-alpha.4, based on Dan Abramov's suggestion.
That suggestion was based on "binding action creators" not being as useful in a hooks-based use case, and causing too
much conceptual overhead and syntactic complexity.
You should probably prefer to call the
useDispatch hook in your components to retrieve a reference to
and manually call
dispatch(someActionCreator()) in callbacks and effects as needed. You may also use the Redux
bindActionCreators function in your own code to bind action creators,
or "manually" bind them like
const boundAddTodo = (text) => dispatch(addTodo(text)).
However, if you'd like to still use this hook yourself, here's a copy-pastable version that supports passing in action creators as a single function, an array, or an object.
There are some architectural trade offs to take into consideration when deciding whether to use hooks or not. Mark Erikson summarizes these nicely in his two blog posts Thoughts on React Hooks, Redux, and Separation of Concerns and Hooks, HOCs, and Tradeoffs.